But the death is…amicable. Altlaw.com announces that they will be shutting down in early 2010.

Filed under: Cool links, Courts, News, Technology, U.S. Law, legal research
November 19, 2009 • 7:53 pm 1
But the death is…amicable. Altlaw.com announces that they will be shutting down in early 2010.

Filed under: Cool links, Courts, News, Technology, U.S. Law, legal research
November 17, 2009 • 6:43 pm 0
From Google’s Official Blog:
Starting today, we’re enabling people everywhere to find and read full text legal opinions from U.S. federal and state district, appellate and supreme courts using Google Scholar. You can find these opinions by searching for cases (like Planned Parenthood v. Casey), or by topics (like desegregation) or other queries that you are interested in. For example, go to Google Scholar, click on the “Legal opinions and journals” radio button, and try the query separate but equal. Your search results will include links to cases familiar to many of us in the U.S. such as Plessy v. Ferguson and Brown v. Board of Education, which explore the acceptablity of “separate but equal” facilities for citizens at two different points in the history of the U.S. But your results will also include opinions from cases that you might be less familiar with, but which have played an important role.

Filed under: Cool links, Courts, News, Technology, U.S. Law, legal research
November 6, 2009 • 2:57 pm 1
Once again, proving the usefulness of Twitter, I find out (via @elizabethf) that Lexis has released a free iPhone/iPodTouch app that allows users to get cases from Lexis and to Shepardize them. You do need to have a current Lexis account. Still, how cool is that?

Filed under: Cool links, Technology, Web 2.0, legal research, social networks, software
October 8, 2009 • 7:00 pm 0
Despite all the controversy about Westlaw getting exclusive rights to the digitized legislative histories compiled by the GAO (see e.g. http://dukelawref.blogspot.com/2008/07/who-owns-legislative-history.html), I really didn’t take a close look until I needed some examples for class. There really is a lot of information in that database, and good quality PDF images. On the other hand, there are some questions about coverage, and some really annoying features in the database organization and search facility.
Coverage starts nominally in 1915, but more fully in 1921 (when the GAO was created). Since the GAO was mostly a green-eyeshade operation up until 1970, the legislative histories must have been to help decide if expenditures were proper. In any case, not all statutes have GAO histories. (Class example: ch. 359 of 1948 – nothing in GAO; use USCCAN instead). When a GAO history is available, especially in more recent years, it is extremely detailed, including texts of amendments. The table of contents for the PDFs, however, is broken up into several pages, sometimes with only one or two entries per page. Presumably, this preserves some information about the contents of bound volumes provided by the GAO, but it makes the set unnecessarily hard to use, and may cause some users to go away disappointed, unaware that more is available for the clicking. The default search template can also be frustrating since it doesn’t have a blank to fill in for chapter number. This is a handicap for earlier session laws that are cited only by chapter number.
Take-away: a big step forward in online access to federal legislative history material, but not one-stop shopping, and with room for improvement. -WT
Filed under: U.S. Law, legal research, library 2.0, research guides
September 2, 2009 • 2:20 pm 0
There is often confusion surrounding the CALI authorization code among new students. Here are a few tips and a 2 minute video that to help you and your students avoid confusion.
Please pass this on to your students:
This may sound confusing, but take two minutes to watch the video and you should understand.
4. Once you’ve registered, use the username/password you created during registration to login at cali.org. Once registration is complete and your account is created, you use your own username and password — not your school’s authorization code, which you can officially scrub from your memory.

Filed under: Law School, Technology, legal research, software
June 15, 2009 • 3:33 pm 0
Add-ons are Firefox extensions that one can add to the basic browser to add new features. Bonnie Sucha, a super librarian at the University of Wisconsin Law Library, has put together a list of add-ons useful for legal/library researchers. Go check ‘em out.
Filed under: Cool links, Technology, Web 2.0, legal research, library 2.0, software
May 5, 2009 • 6:56 pm 0
Pace University School of Law has compiled a guide to free and low cost resources for legal research. Looks great!

Filed under: Cool links, U.S. Law, legal research, research guides
April 1, 2009 • 2:37 pm 0
Hat tip to the Law Librarian Blog for pointing out that Harvard has created a series of short video tutorials on a bunch of legal research topics. Check ‘em out on Harvard’s YouTube Channel.

Filed under: Twitter/Jaiku, Web 2.0, legal research, library 2.0, research guides, social networks, video
March 19, 2009 • 12:57 pm 0
Our own Prof. Sloan was highlighted in the Law Librarian Blog today for her article, Step Right Up: Using Consumer Decision Making Theory to Teach Research Process in the Electronic Age.

Filed under: Cool links, Law School, Teaching, Technology, legal research
February 2, 2009 • 2:42 pm 0
Joe Hodnicki, over at the Law Librarian Blog, alerts us to some new legal research tools available from the United Nations.
Filed under: Cool links, international law, legal research